Let’s talk about the market. Bitcoin’s short-term resistance line is 52,000. I just don’t know how to wash it next. It's uncertain whether it will fall horizontally or fall to between 30,000 and 40,000.
But the upward trend this year is relatively certain. The layout has basically been completed, mainly cottages. Even if the pie reaches 150,000, there will only be a 2-fold increase, and if the aunt's income rises to 12,000, there will only be a 3-fold increase. I don’t know whether it will rise or fall in the short term. If it goes sideways instead of falling, that’s it.
The current situation is that even if it rises, it will not feel short. If it falls, it will fall. The whole network is waiting for the correction of Bitcoin. Old leeks are waiting, and new leeks are also waiting. After waiting and waiting, more and more people are short. The more, if you still follow the logic of the last bull market and do this bull market, you will most likely fail! Once again, don’t rely too much on on-chain data and indicators. Please ignore all the noise and patiently learn the market logic! Holding is the best money-making strategy in the entire bull market
uni is about to return to zero, let me talk about uni in my eyes!
Many people say that uni has no empowerment and is just a governance token, so it has no value.
However, yesterday the foundation decided to allocate any protocol fees proportionally to UNI token holders who have pledged and delegated their voting rights. The money-sharing model will soon be seen in major projects.
Some people also say that the governance of uni is tightly controlled by a16z. They originally wanted to deploy one on bnb, but they encountered opposition. Even cz dispatched to diss a16z.
Many people think that uniswap should be uploaded to bsc. Isn’t that one more channel? This will create an increase in uni’s business.
What uni currently needs is not just incremental growth. It has already spread its branches on the largest public chain. What it needs is stability and stability. Safety and stability without glitches are the most important thing. An additional BSC will not qualitatively help his business volume.
So assuming that uni is really deployed on bsc, if one day bsc has something to do with uni, or there is some other black swan.
Because BSC also engages in dex and is a direct competitor.
If one day BSC deliberately causes problems with the Uniswap pool, or BSC stops using Uni, a large number of coins will be locked on it. So is this a negative impact on uni?
The biggest original sin of BSC is centralization. They can directly stop the chain.
As for a16z, which holds the governance rights, they hold uni worth hundreds of millions of dollars, and they hope that uni will develop stably. Rather than for a little increase, if something goes wrong, he does not need one more BSC to increase his transaction volume, which is insignificant to its development. Don't people who use BSC not use the Ethereum chain? Is it possible that large investors want to save handling fees? Don’t you want to use the Ethereum chain? This problem naturally does not exist.
Therefore, uni finally made the right choice not to deploy dex on bsc. The organization is so awesome and sees a side that ordinary people cannot see.
Others say that uni has no dividends, no empowerment, and so on. It's just air, so uni has no future and can't compete with other CEX. If you have this idea, I suggest you stay away from uni.
The smartest thing about uni is that it does not empower. Because it does this, uni will always have the expected empowerment. The most important point is that uni will never be classified as a security by sec, and then directly Stifled or regulated by sec.
If it is regulated or strangled, the significance of uni as a decentralized exchange will be lost. Therefore, it can be said that uni is doing this through hard work, and it gives all the handling fees to LP. Which dex can do this, and which cex can do this. uni proves his innocence and turns himself into air, but it turns out to be a shortcoming that is criticized by others. In fact, this is what it has to do.
My prediction for uni's future is that it should logically exceed the market value of centralized exchanges. For example, in the next cycle, the entire web3 world will be valued at 4 trillion U.S. dollars. Then uni will account for 5% of it. I think It is reasonable, that is, 200 billion U.S. dollars. So what is the market value of uni today? It is only 7.2 billion U.S. dollars.
Uni does not have a lot of costs like the CEX exchange, it has almost no cost. And when exchange problems occur frequently, uni will definitely be able to occupy a stable share of the trading market, because people gradually begin to prefer to trust machines rather than people.
If you put your coins on CEX, you may not get them. If you put your coins on Uni and do LP, you can withdraw them at any time. They will never be misappropriated, and you will still earn handling fees. If it were you, which one would you choose? As long as they are big investors with a lot of money in their hands, they will have this idea.
The above is my logic. If you have your own opinions, you can also leave me a comment.
